arqocomparison · 05
    Honest comparison

    arqo
    vs Highland

    Highland is the minimalist screenwriter’s tool — Fountain-native, Mac/iPad/iPhone, beautifully restrained, made by working screenwriters. Arqo is the alternative if you also write on Windows or Android, want collab, want an opt-in assistant, or want production-side reports without leaving the app.

    We’d rather lose the click than lose the trust.

    §8.6.1Where Highland is genuinely betterwe lead with this on purpose
    they win
    Minimalist craft and typography

    Highland is one of the best-feeling screenwriting tools on a Mac, period. Sprint Mode, typewriter scrolling, the Bin sidebar, the Gender Analysis pass — every surface feels considered. Arqo is more feature-broad; Highland is more feature-restrained, and that’s a real virtue.

    they win
    Made by working screenwriters with cred

    Highland comes from John August (Big Fish, Charlie’s Angels, Frankenweenie). The taste in the tool is real, and a lot of writers trust the brand for exactly that reason. Arqo is earning that trust; Highland already has it.

    they win
    Native Apple-platform polish + iCloud sync

    Mac, iPad, iPhone — each runs as a native app with iCloud sync between them. Arqo’s iPhone/iPad app is real and native too, but Highland’s is hand-built per platform and feels it.

    §8.6.2Where Arqo is the better toolclaims that hold up to a code audit
    arqo wins
    Cross-platform — Windows, Android, Linux web

    Highland is Mac/iPad/iPhone only. Arqo runs the same Fountain editor on Windows, Mac, iPhone, iPad, Android, and the web. If you ever switch laptops or write on a non-Apple device, Highland isn’t there.

    arqo wins
    Real-time multi-cursor collab

    Highland is single-writer by design. Arqo lets you co-write live: multiple cursors, named presence, see-them-typing. If you ever co-write — a partner, a writers’ room, a producer pass — Highland routes you back to emailing the Fountain file around.

    arqo wins
    Production reports and FDX round-trip

    Highland exports FDX and PDF cleanly; it doesn’t ship character/location/DOOD reports or a coloured-page rotation engine. Arqo covers the production-side workflow, not just the writing-side one. If your script is going into prep, Arqo carries you further.

    arqo wins
    Arqo Staff (opt-in, bring-your-own)

    Highland deliberately skips content-generation features. Arqo ships three bounded Iv routes on Pro+, and you can plug in your own key so prompts run through it — +$2/mo add-on on Pro, included on Studio. Both stances are coherent; if an assistant is part of your writing process, Arqo is the better fit. /no-list is what we won’t ship.

    §8.6.3Side by side · Arqo vs Highlandparity rows are intentional · 'them' rows are intentional
    Feature
    Highland
    Arqo
    Minimalist UI craft
    reference-grade
    broader feature surface
    them
    Working-screenwriter brand cred
    high (John August)
    building
    them
    Native Apple-platform polish
    mac/ipad/iphone hand-built
    native, newer
    them
    Sprint Mode
    native
    partial · focus mode
    them
    Cross-platform (non-Apple)
    mac/ipad/iphone only
    win/mac/ios/android/web
    arqo
    Real-time multi-cursor collab
    no
    shipped · live cursors
    arqo
    Production reports (DOOD)
    no
    char / loc / DOOD
    arqo
    Coloured-page revisions
    partial
    shipped · full rotation
    arqo
    Assistant in the editor
    /Lookup only · no inline writing
    bring-your-own key (+$2 add-on or Studio) · 3 bounded routes
    arqo
    Story framework library
    no
    12+ frameworks · live
    arqo
    Fountain-native
    yes
    yes
    =
    FDX export
    export
    bidirectional · golden tests
    arqo
    Bin sidebar
    yes
    yes
    =
    §8.6.4What Arqo will not donot vague. these are the buttons we won't ship.
    refused
    No removing Iv to match Highland’s "tool, not collaborator" stance

    Highland deliberately ships no content-generation features. We respect the stance and disagree on the trade. Iv on Arqo is opt-in, bring-your-own-key, and bounded — but it’s in the box. If you want a tool that refuses any assistant as a category, Highland is the right answer.

    refused
    No "auto-complete the next line" inline writing

    Even with Iv, the line we hold is Highland’s line: the tool will not finish your sentences. Suggest gives you a panel of options to consider; it does not write into your cursor.

    refused
    No locking writers out for using their phone

    Highland on Mac is excellent, but if you also need to write on a Pixel on the train, Highland blocks you. Arqo will not gate platforms behind premium tiers — phone editor is in Free.

    Full signed list at /no-list.

    Switching from Highland?
    The migration is four steps. /switch-from-highland →

    Free tier opens two scripts. No card. Bring your file, see how it lands.

    §8.6.5Common questions
    I love Highland on my Mac. Should I switch?+

    Probably not, if you write only on a Mac and want a minimalist single-writer surface. Highland is great at what it does. Switch when you also write on Windows/Android/web, want live collab, or want an assistant on rails. Both tools can coexist — both are Fountain-native.

    Will my Highland file open in Arqo?+

    Yes. Save your Highland file as Fountain and import. Highland’s Fountain extras (notes, colored sections) survive as Fountain note blocks. The /switch-from-highland guide walks the four-step migration.

    Does Arqo have Sprint Mode?+

    Partial. Arqo has Focus mode (hides everything but the current scene). The full word-target Sprint surface — set a count, beat the timer — is on the 2026-Q3 roadmap.

    Does Arqo have Highland’s Bin?+

    Yes — equivalent UI ships in Arqo, and Highland’s Bin items survive the import as Fountain notes that re-bin into our sidebar.

    Highland refuses any kind of writing assistant by design. Why does Arqo ship one?+

    A coherent disagreement. Highland’s position is that any assistant in the editor changes the writing relationship — true. Our position is that an opt-in, narrow, bring-your-own-key assistant is more honest than pretending the category doesn’t exist. /no-list is what we will not ship; the line is conservative.

    Is Arqo’s Mac app as good as Highland’s?+

    Honest answer: Highland is more polished as a Mac-only product. Arqo’s Mac app is real and native, but the typography and platform-feel work Highland has put in over a decade is something we’re still earning.

    arqotryarqo.com · comparison · 05