Arqo reads the scripts you've already written, matches the rhythm in your pages, and offers lines that sound like you wrote them. You ask for them. You accept, edit, or throw them away. An amplifier, not a replacement — you never leave the chair.
It used to say “Write in my voice.”
Now it says “Suggest in my voice.”
“Write” puts the AI in the chair. It implies the tool produces the page and you approve it. That's the replacement story — the one thing Arqo promised it would never be.
“Suggest” keeps you in the chair. The tool offers a line in your register; the decision — and the keystroke — is always yours. Same engine, honest framing.
Arqo indexes the scripts already in your library — only yours. Each scene is embedded so the patterns in your writing are searchable, not pooled into a shared model.
When you ask, it pulls the closest passages you've actually written — your cadence, your word choices, your subtext — and uses them as the reference for the suggestion.
You get a suggestion that reads like your draft, not generic AI. Accept it, edit it first, or reject it. Nothing touches your script until you say so.
Describe the beat you're stuck on. Arqo drafts a candidate in your register and shows you exactly how grounded it is — how many of your own passages it leaned on, and which model produced it.
Arqo never surfaces a suggestion you didn't explicitly request. No ghost autocomplete inventing dialogue while you type. The line appears because you went and asked for it.
Suggestions are grounded in your own scripts and nobody else's. Your writing is never pooled into a shared model or handed to another account.
Nothing lands in your script automatically. Accept it, edit it into your own words first, or reject it outright — the final text is always typed by your decision.
Each suggestion tells you how many of your passages it leaned on and which model produced it. No black box pretending to be your muse.